Information Collection Request (ICR) Tracker
ICR Definition
An Information Collection Request (ICR) is a federal agency’s request for approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to collect information from the public.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), agencies must justify why the information is needed and how it will be used.
Federal agencies are required to submit an ICR whenever they create, renew, modify, or discontinue an information collection. Each ICR includes a description of the collection,
supporting materials and documentation (such as forms, surveys, or scripts), and proof that the agency has met the requirements of the PRA.
The ICR is submitted to the The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within OMB for review and approval. OIRA grants approval for a maximum of three years, after
which the collection must be renewed through a new ICR submission.
ICRs are publicly available on RegInfo.gov, and additional guidance can be found in the FAQs.
ICR Explorer
Showing 20 of 13222 results
| Reference Number | Title | Agency | Status | Request Type | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 202112-3170-004 | Generic Information Collection Plan for Consumer Complaint and Information Collection System (Testing and Feedback) | CFPB | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Generic Information Collection Plan for Consumer Complaint and Information Collection System (Testing and Feedback)
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 111 - 203 1013(b)(3), 1021(c)(2),1034 (View Law) AbstractThe CFPB has undertaken a variety of service delivery-focused activities contemplated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law No. 111-2013 (Dodd-Frank Act). These activities, which include consumer complaint and inquiry processing, referral, and monitoring, involve several interrelated systems. The streamlined process of the generic clearance will continue to allow the Bureau to implement these systems efficiently in line with the Bureau’s commitment to continuous improvement of its delivery of services through iterative testing and feedback collection. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-0348-009 | Improving Customer Experience (OMB Circular A-11, Section 280 Implementation) | OMB | Active | New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
Improving Customer Experience (OMB Circular A-11, Section 280 Implementation)
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
AbstractThe President’s Management Agenda (PMA) prioritizes efforts to improve the experience of those the Government serves—all of the people, families, businesses, organizations, and communities across America, especially those communities that are underserved by Government, when they use Government services. This focus on customer experience will not only improve the delivery, efficiency, security, and effectiveness of our government programs, it will advance equity and enhance everyday interactions with public services and uplift the lives of those who need them the most. To support this, OMB Circular A-11 Section 280 establishes Government-wide standards for mature customer experience organizations in government. In order for Federal programs to design and deliver the experience taxpayers deserve, they must often undertake three general categories of activities: conduct ongoing customer research, gather and share customer feedback, and test services and digital products. Both the PMA and Section 280 charge the President’s Management Council—the primary Government-wide body that advises the President and OMB on management issues that span agencies—with the routine designation of cross-agency “life experiences” for improvement (such as turning 65, surviving a natural disaster, or having a child) that do not fit neatly within one agency’s mission area. This new request will enable the Office of Management and Budget to act in accordance with OMB Circular A-11 Section 280 to ultimately transform the experience of its customers to improve both efficiency and mission delivery, and increase accountability by communicating about these efforts with the public. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202203-2133-001 | Maritime Administration (MARAD) Exercise Breakout Survey | DOT/MARAD | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Maritime Administration (MARAD) Exercise Breakout Survey
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes49 USC 192 (View Law) AbstractThis is a survey that will be conducted on a voluntary basis that provides vital information to the Ready Reserve Force Program. This exercise is designed to test MARAD’s internal administrative procedures, as well as the coordination necessary for a complete activation of MARAD's Ready Reserve Force (RRF) and the Military Sealift Command (MSC) Surge Sealift Fleet to meet strategic sealift requirements. Periodic testing is necessary in view of the dynamics that affect the RRF program, which include changes in RRF fleet composition, readiness status, ship location as well as changes to the seafaring manpower base. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-0570-003CF | Request for Advance or Reimbursement, SF 270 | USDA/RBS | Active | RCF New
Request for Advance or Reimbursement, SF 270
Key Information
|
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-3265-005CF | Request to use SF424 forms for EAC Grant Compliance | EAC | Active | RCF New
Request to use SF424 forms for EAC Grant Compliance
Key Information
|
||||||||||||||||
| 202112-1105-002 | Special Deputation Forms | DOJ/LA | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Special Deputation Forms
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes28 USC 567 (View Law) 28 USC 564 (View Law) 28 USC 565 (View Law) 28 USC 566 (View Law) 28 USC 568 (View Law) 28 USC 569 (View Law) 28 USC 561 (View Law) 28 USC 562 (View Law) 28 USC 563 (View Law) AbstractThe USMS is authorized to deputize selected persons to perform the functions of a Special Deputy U.S. Marshal whenever the law enforcement needs of the USMS so require and as designated by the Associate Attorney General pursuant to 28 CFR 0.19(a)(3). USMS Special Deputation files serve as a centralized record of the special deputations granted by the USMS to assist in tracking, controlling and monitoring the Special Deputation Program. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-0348-005 | Generic Clearance for the Collection of Formative Research on Agency Service Delivery | OMB | Active | New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
Generic Clearance for the Collection of Formative Research on Agency Service Delivery
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes44 USC 3504 (View Law) Pub.L. 116 - 260 Division E, Title II (View Law) AbstractThe mission of USDS is to deliver better government services through technology and design. In support of that mission, USDS engages directly with program applicants and beneficiaries, and other people who use or need to use the government systems and services we are helping to improve, and incorporates their feedback into our work and recommendations. By employing human-centered design practices like user research, USDS prioritizes the user’s needs and learns what works as quickly as possible, saving time and money while improving services to the public. USDS deploys small, responsive groups of designers, engineers, product managers, and other specialists to work with and empower civil servants, working with many agencies simultaneously. Under this generic clearance, USDS would engage in a variety of formative data collections with people who use or need to use government systems and services, such as program participants, practitioners, and service providers. The data collections would occur primarily through Discovery Sprints, which are short research projects designed to quickly understand complexities of systems or services in order to identify issues with service delivery, their root causes, and opportunities for improvement. Data collections would also occur during longer projects, as needed. USDS’s research serves to provide further understanding of whether people engaging directly with government services are having an effective, efficient, and satisfying experience. USDS anticipates undertaking a variety of new research projects related to social safety net and general welfare programs, economic recovery efforts, healthcare, and more. Many Federal agencies and field offices find a need to learn more about the public’s perceptions, experiences and expectations; early warnings of issues with service delivery; or areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. USDS envisions using a variety of techniques, including: • Pre-study self-identification questionnaires • Unmoderated comment cards/complaint forms • Unmoderated qualitative user experience surveys (e.g., post-transaction surveys; opt-out web surveys) • Unmoderated information architecture evaluative methods (e.g., card sorts; tree tests) • Unmoderated content evaluative methods • Long-term behavior and experience studies (e.g., diary study) • Focus groups • User research studies (e.g., user interviews; usability tests) • Program assessment questionnaires. Overall, this research will be designed to fulfill the following goals: (1) discover barriers to access that create inequities for users of government systems and services; (2) inform the development of USDS and agency research, (3) discover early warnings of issues with service delivery; and (4) focus attention on areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. These collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative, and actionable communications between Federal agencies and the public. It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement of program management. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-3265-006CF | Request to use SF424A for EAC Grant Compliance | EAC | Active | RCF New
Request to use SF424A for EAC Grant Compliance
Key Information
|
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-1190-001 | Procedures for the Administration of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 | DOJ/CRT | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Procedures for the Administration of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes42 USC 1973c (View Law) AbstractJurisdictions specially covered under the Voting Rights Act are required to obtain preclearance from the Attorney General (AG) before instituting changes. They must convince the Attorney General that voting changes are not racially discriminatory. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-3265-008CF | Request to use SF428,A,B,C for EAC Grant Compliance | EAC | Active | RCF New
Request to use SF428,A,B,C for EAC Grant Compliance
Key Information
|
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-3265-007CF | Request to use SFLLL for EAC Grant Compliance | EAC | Active | RCF New
Request to use SFLLL for EAC Grant Compliance
Key Information
|
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-1122-003 | Semi-annual Progress Report for Children and Youth Exposed to Violence Program | DOJ/OVW | Historical Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Semi-annual Progress Report for Children and Youth Exposed to Violence Program
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 113 - 235 Div. B (View Law) AbstractThe Consolidated Grant Program to Address Children and Youth Experiencing Domestic and Sexual Assault and Engage Men and Boys as Allies (hereinafter referred to as the Consolidated Youth Program) was enacted in the FY 2012- 2022 appropriation acts and consolidates four previously authorized and appropriated programs into one comprehensive program. The four programs included in theses consolidations were Services to Advocate for and Respond to Youth (Youth Services), Assist Children and Youth Exposed to Violence (CEV), Engaging Men and Youth in Preventing Domestic Violence (EMY), and Supporting Teens through Education and Prevention (STEP). While OVW develops a new form for this consolidated grant program, certain Consolidated Youth Program grantees will be using the semi-annual progress reporting form previously developed for CEV grantees. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-1105-001 | Annuity Broker Qualification Declaration Form | DOJ/LA | Historical Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Annuity Broker Qualification Declaration Form
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 107 - 273 11015 (View Law) AbstractThis declaration is to be submitted to determine whether a broker meets the minimum qualifications to be listed as an annuity broker pursuant to Section 11015(b) of Public Law 107-273. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-1122-001 | Semi-Annual Progress Report for the Grants to Enhance Culturally Specific Services for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking | DOJ/OVW | Historical Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Semi-Annual Progress Report for the Grants to Enhance Culturally Specific Services for Victims of Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, Sexual Assault, and Stalking
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes34 USC 20124 (View Law) AbstractThis is a progress report form for one of OVW's grant programs, the CulturallySpecific Services Program which funds projects that promote the maintenance and replication of existing successful domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking community-based programs providing culturally and linguistically specific services and other resources. The program also supports the development of innovative culturally and linguistically specific strategies and projects to enhance access to services and resources for victims of violence against women. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-1122-002 | Progress Report for Sexual Assault Services Formula Grant Program | DOJ/OVW | Historical Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Progress Report for Sexual Assault Services Formula Grant Program
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes34 USC 12511(b) (View Law) AbstractThe Sexual Assault Services Formula Grant Program (SASP), created by the Violence Against Women Act of 2005 (VAWA 2005), is the first federal funding stream solely dedicated to the provision of direct intervention and related assistance for victims of sexual assault. The SASP encompasses four different funding streams for States and Territories, Tribes, State Sexual Assault Coalitions, Tribal Coalitions, and culturally specific organizations. Overall, the purpose of SASP is to provide intervention, advocacy, accompaniment, support services, and related assistance for adult, youth, and child victims of sexual assault, family and household members of victims, and those collaterally affected by the sexual assault. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-0938-007 | Initial Plan Data Collection to Support QHP Certification and other Financial Management and Exchange Operations (CMS-10433) | HHS/CMS | Historical Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Initial Plan Data Collection to Support QHP Certification and other Financial Management and Exchange Operations (CMS-10433)
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 111 - 148 1411-1412 (View Law) Pub.L. 111 - 148 1301-1304, 1311-1312 (View Law) Pub.L. 111 - 148 1321-1322 (View Law) Pub.L. 111 - 148 1343, 1401-1402 (View Law) Pub.L. 111 - 148 1324, 1341 (View Law) AbstractAs required by the CMS-9989-F: Establishment of Exchanges and Qualified Health Plans; Exchange Standards for Employers ("Exchange rule"), each Exchange must assume responsibilities related to the certification and offering of Qualified Health Plans ("QHP"). To offer insurance through an Exchange, a health insurance issuer must have its health plans certified as QHPs by the Exchange. A QHP must meet certain minimum certification standards, such as network adequacy, actuarial value standards, and the offering of the essential health benefits (EHB). The Exchange is responsible for ensuring that QHPs meet these minimum certification standards as described in the Exchange rule under 45 CFR 155 and 156, based on the Affordable Care Act, as well as other requirements determined by the Exchange. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202203-0648-004 | NOAA Bay Watershed Education and Training (B-WET) Program National Evaluation System | DOC/NOAA | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
NOAA Bay Watershed Education and Training (B-WET) Program National Evaluation System
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes33 USC 893a(a) (View Law) AbstractThis is a request for an extension of an existing information collection. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of Education is sponsoring data collection efforts on its Bay Watershed Education and Training (B-WET) program. B-WET advances NOAA’s mission by awarding education grants that foster an environmentally literate citizenry who have the knowledge, attitudes, and skills needed to protect watersheds and related ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes ecosystems. B-WET currently funds projects in seven regions (California, Chesapeake Bay, Great Lakes, Gulf of Mexico, Hawaii, New England, and the Pacific Northwest). To ensure high-quality educational activities funded by B-WET, we created a cross-region, internal evaluation system that collects information from B-WET awardees and their teacher participants to provide ongoing monitoring of program implementation and to identify opportunities for improved program outcomes. B-WET awardees and teacher participants complete online survey forms to provide data for the evaluation system. Awardees are surveyed once per year of the project and teachers are surveyed twice, once after completing professional development programs and once after teaching their students about watershed. Information collected from awardees includes program elements such as program duration, format, audience, location, support and/or materials offered, and topics covered. Information collected from teacher professional development participants includes teaching methodologies, program satisfaction, program coverage, suggestions for improvement, and teaching confidence. This data collection effort benefits those who receive B-WET grants and project participants of those grants by providing regular program improvements that they can leverage to implement successful projects. The B-WET evaluation system is designed to collect data on a continuous basis (annually for grantees and as described above for teachers). However data collection is currently paused due to the fact that the national evaluation instruments are not designed to assess project implementation during the ongoing impacts of the pandemic. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-2060-001 | NSPS for New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ) (Renewal) | EPA/OAR | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
NSPS for New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ) (Renewal)
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes42 USC 7401-7671q (View Law) AbstractThe New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart QQQQ) to new residential hydronic heaters, forced-air furnaces, or other central heaters manufactured either on or after May 15, 2015 and sold or distributed in the United States. The residential hydronic heater and forced-air furnace NSPS establishes a certification program, instead of the usual NSPS requirement that each affected facility demonstrate compliance with emission limits through performance testing. Under this certification program, a single heating appliance is tested to demonstrate compliance with particulate matter (PM) emission limits for an entire model line which could consist of thousands of stoves. The use of a certification approach significantly reduces the compliance burden, including information collection, for the manufacturers of hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces. Each manufacturer subject to Subpart QQQQ is required to keep records of all documentation pertaining to the certification testing for each model line, the results of the quality assurance program inspections, and a sealed sample of each heater or furnace upon which certification tests were performed and certification granted. Each approved test laboratory and third-party certifier must maintain records consisting of all documentation pertaining to each certification test, quality assurance program inspection and audit test. Manufacturers must also submit the test reports and other documentation to EPA when they apply for a certificate of compliance for each model line. These reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities subject to NSPS. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart QQQQ. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202204-0920-001 | Annual Submission of the Ingredients Added to, and the Quantity of Nicotine Contained in, Smokeless Manufactured, Imported, or Packaged in the U.S. | HHS/CDC | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Annual Submission of the Ingredients Added to, and the Quantity of Nicotine Contained in, Smokeless Manufactured, Imported, or Packaged in the U.S.
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 99 - 252 4403 (View Law) AbstractThis Information Collection Request (ICR) supports the Extension of a Congressionally mandated information collection. The Comprehensive Smokeless Tobacco Health Education Act of 1986 (15 U.S.C. 4401 et seq. or Pub.L. 99-252) requires each person who manufactures, packages, or imports smokeless tobacco products to provide the Secretary of HHS with an annual list of ingredients added to tobacco in the manufacture of smokeless tobacco products, as well as a specification of quantity of nicotine contained in each product. Responsibility for collecting the information has been delegated to CDC's Office on Smoking and Health. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202203-0584-005 | Annual State Report on Verification of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participation (Renewal) | USDA/FNS | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Annual State Report on Verification of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participation (Renewal)
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 113 - 79 4032 (View Law) AbstractThis collection requiring State agencies to verify that systems are in place to comply with associated regulations governing SNAP. FNS require that State agencies disqualify an individual who has committed an intentional program violation (IPV). Additionally, it requires that these individuals “be disqualified in accordance with the disqualification periods and procedures and requires State agencies to report information concerning each individual disqualified for an IPV to the disqualified recipient database, the electronic Disqualified Recipient System (eDRS), and to use eDRS data to determine the eligibility of individual applicants prior to certification. FNS also require that each State agency establish a system to verify and ensure that benefits are not issued to individuals who are deceased, and that data source is the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) Death Master File. |
Why They Are Important
ICRs play a vital role in ensuring transparency and accountability in federal data collection. When federal agencies collect information from 10 or more "persons" (which includes individuals,
businesses, and state, local, and tribal governments), they must submit an ICR to ensure that it fulfills their statutory missions, avoids unnecessary or duplicative requests, and
minimizes burden on the American public. Additionally, Federal Register Notices (FRNs) and the opportunity for public comments provide a formal way for the public to be informed of
proposed ICRs and participate in the process.
ICRs also serve as a key resource for tracking changes to federal data collections. The availability of detailed documentation, such as data collection instruments and methodologies,
allows the general public to identify revisions in a timely manner. These may include revisions prompted by Executive Orders or statistical policies like
OMB's Statistical Policy Directive No. 15 (SPD 15), which are often submitted as "nonsubstantive" or "nonmaterial" changes to a
currently approved collection.[1] Furthermore, ICRs can help determine if a data collection has expired without renewal or has been intentionally
discontinued. By reviewing ICRs, the public can better understand what data is being collected, how it evolves over time, and whether data collections have become inactive–often in response
to shifting priorities and updated standards.
How To Use The Tool
The ICR tracking tool offers a user-friendly view of ICRs that have been recently submitted, reviewed, or are nearing expiration. By aggregating key data from individual ICRs,
the tool allows users to view the current status of each request, including submission, conclusion, and expiration dates, details on whether any changes were made, authorizing statutes,
and more. Users can search for specific information and filter results based on various criteria. If seeking additional information, various text fields are hyperlinked to the full ICR
on RegInfo.gov and associated resources. The tool is updated on a daily basis to reflect the most current information available.
Column descriptions are available below the table.
Column Name
Definition
Categories Include
ICRReferenceNumber
The ICR Reference Number uniquely identifies each ICR review. This number is assigned by the OIRA system when the ICR is created.
ICR Reference Numbers are formatted YYYYMM-NNNN-XXX where YYYYMM is the month of origin, NNNN is the agency/subagency code, and XXX is a 3 digit sequential number assigned per creation per month.
N/A
ICRTitle
The title of the information collection. If the submission is a revision to a currently approved collection, the title is the name of the overall collection rather than the name of the change taking place.
N/A
DateReceived
The date OIRA received the ICR submission from the agency.
N/A
OMBControl
OIRA assigns an OMB Control Number to an Information Collection Request (ICR) upon its first arrival. The same OMB Control Number is used for each review of the ICR.
OMB Control Numbers are formatted NNNN-XXXX, where the NNNN is the agency/subagency code, and the XXXX is a sequential number uniquely identifying the Collection within the agency/subagency’s ICRs.
N/A
DateReceived
The date OIRA received the ICR submission from the agency.
N/A
PreviousICRReferenceNumber
The reference number of the ICR that immediately preceded the current one.
N/A
AgencySubagency
The federal agency and specific subagency, if applicable, that submitted the ICR.
N/A
Abstract
A brief statement describing the need for the collection of information and how it will be used.
N/A
RequestType
Describes the purpose of the agency's submission.
- "Extension without change of a currently approved collection"
- "Existing collection in use without an OMB Control Number"
- "Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection"
- "New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)"
- "No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection"
- "Revision of a currently approved collection"
- "Reinstatement without change of a previously approved collection"
- "RCF Recertification"
- "RCF No Material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection"
- "RCF New"
TypeOfReviewRequest
Indicates the specific type of action being requested for review.
- "Regular"
- "Emergency"
- "Delegated"
Status
Indicates the current stage of the ICR in OIRA's review process.
- "Received in OIRA" for ICRs currently under review by OIRA
- "Active" for ICRs that are currently approved for use by agencies
- "Historical Active" for previous reviews of ICRs that are currently in the active inventory
- "Historical Inactive" for previous reviews of ICRs that are not currently in the active inventory
- "PreApproved" for ICRs that will become active once the Final Rule of their associated rulemaking has been published
ConcludedDate
The date OIRA completed its review of the ICR.
N/A
ConclusionAction
OIRA's final decision about the ICR.
- “Comment filed on Interim Final Rule”
- “Comment filed on Interim Final Rule and continue”
- “Disapproved”
- “Approved without change”
- “Approved with change”
- “Comment filed on proposed rule”
- “Preapproved”
- “Withdrawn”
- “Withdrawn and continue”
- “Not subject to PRA”
- “Not subject to PRA and continue”
- “Improperly submitted”
- “Improperly submitted and continue”
- “Delegated”
- “Comment filed on proposed rule and continue”
- “Disapproved and continue”
- “Returned - Improperly Submitted”
- “Returned to Agency for Reconsideration”
- “Returned - Outside Generic Clearance”
- “Approved”
CurrentExpirationDate
The date the ICR is set to expire unless it is renewed.
N/A
AuthorizingStatues
Names of federal laws that authorize the agency to collect the information.
N/A
AuthorizingStatuesDetails
Additional details about the legal authority for the information collection, including a URL linking to the full text.
N/A
CitationsForNewStatutoryRequirements
Legal citations that have introduced new or modified statutory requirements since the last ICR submission.
N/A
FederalRegisterNotices
Lists citations of 60-day and 30-day notices published in the Federal Register.
N/A
PublicCommentsReceived
Indicates whether any public comments were received during the Federal Register notice period.
N/A
InformationCollections
Lists the individual information collections associated with the ICR. Each collection includes metadata such as the title, a URL to the collection, the form number (if applicable), and a URL to the form.
N/A
RequestType Filters
1. Select "New collection (Request for an OMB Control Number)" for collections that had not previously been used or sponsored by the agency.
2. Select "Extension without change or a currently approved collection" for collections where the agency wished only to extend the approval of an active collection past its current expiration date without making any material change in the collection instrument, instructions, frequency of collection, or the use to which the information is to be put.
3. Select "Revision of a currently approved collection" for collections where the agency request included a material change to the collection instrument, instructions, its frequency of collection, or the use to which the information is to be put.
4. Select "Reinstatement without change of a previously approved collection" for collections which previously had OMB approval, but the approval had expired or was discontinued before this submission was made, and there is no change to the collection.
5. Select "Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection" for collections which previously had OMB approval, but the approval has expired or was discontinued before this submission was made, and there is some change to the collection.
6. Select "Existing collection in use without OMB control number" when the collection is currently in use but does not have an OMB control number.
7. Select "No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection" for collections which introduce minor changes to the ICR, but do not extend the expiration date of the collection.
8. Select "RCF No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection" for RCF collections that introduce changes to the usage of an active RCF.
9. Select "RCF New" for RCF collections that are the initial usage of the Common Form Host ICR by the using agency.
10. Select "RCF Recertification" for RCF collections that had been recertified due to changes in its related Common Form Host ICR.
[1] "Nonsubstantive" and "nonmaterial" changes introduce minor modifications to the ICR but do not extend the collection's expiration date or require a public comment period.