Information Collection Request (ICR) Tracker
ICR Definition
An Information Collection Request (ICR) is a federal agency’s request for approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to collect information from the public.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), agencies must justify why the information is needed and how it will be used.
Federal agencies are required to submit an ICR whenever they create, renew, modify, or discontinue an information collection. Each ICR includes a description of the collection,
supporting materials and documentation (such as forms, surveys, or scripts), and proof that the agency has met the requirements of the PRA.
The ICR is submitted to the The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within OMB for review and approval. OIRA grants approval for a maximum of three years, after
which the collection must be renewed through a new ICR submission.
ICRs are publicly available on RegInfo.gov, and additional guidance can be found in the FAQs.
ICR Explorer
Showing 20 of 12081 results
| Reference Number | Title | Agency | Status | Request Type | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 202504-3090-003 | Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery (GSA) | GSA | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery (GSA)
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
AbstractThis collection of information is necessary to enable the Agency to garner customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely manner, in accordance with our commitment to improving service delivery. The information collected from our customers and stakeholders will help ensure that users have an effective, efficient, and satisfying experience with the Agency's programs. This feedback will provide insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences and expectations; provide an early warning of issues with service; or focus attention on areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. These collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable communications between the Agency and its customers and stakeholders. It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement of program management. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-0920-006 | Program Evaluation of CDC’s Core State Injury Prevention Program | HHS/CDC | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Program Evaluation of CDC’s Core State Injury Prevention Program
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes42 USC 241 (View Law) AbstractThis program evaluation is intended to assess both recipient-level and program-level outcomes associated with the NCIPC's Core SIPP funded state injury prevention program. Evaluation metrics will assess injury prevention-focused infrastructure development, surveillance system development and use, and partnerships. This revision request is to add three recipients to the data collection. The estimated change in burden from the last OMB approval is an increase of 109 hours. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-1212-002 | Administrative Appeals | PBGC | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Administrative Appeals
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes29 USC 1303 (View Law) AbstractPBGC’s regulation on Rules for Administrative Review of Agency Decisions (29 CFR part 4003) prescribes rules governing the issuance of initial determinations by PBGC and the procedures for requesting and obtaining administrative review of initial determinations. Certain types of initial determinations are subject to administrative appeals, which are covered in subpart D of the regulation. Subpart D prescribes rules on who may file appeals, when and where to file appeals, contents of appeals, and other matters relating to appeals. Under § 4003.54, an appeal must: (1) be in writing; (2) be clearly designated as an appeal; (3) specifically explain why PBGC’s determination is wrong and the result the appellant is seeking; (4) describe the relevant information the appellant believes is known by PBGC, and summarize any other information the appellant believes is relevant; (5) state whether the appellant desires to appear in person or through a representative before the Appeals Board; and (6) state whether the appellant desires to present witnesses to testify before the Appeals Board, and if so, state why the presence of witnesses will further the decision-making process. Under the regulation, where the appellant believes that another person may be aggrieved if PBGC grants the relief sought, the appeal must include the name(s) and address(es) (if known) of such other person(s). |
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-9000-003 | Indirect Cost Rate Proposals, Payments to Small Business Subcontractors, and Bankruptcy Notifications - FAR Sections Affected: 52.216-7, 52.216-15, 52.242-4, 52.242-5 and 52.242-13 | FAR | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Indirect Cost Rate Proposals, Payments to Small Business Subcontractors, and Bankruptcy Notifications - FAR Sections Affected: 52.216-7, 52.216-15, 52.242-4, 52.242-5 and 52.242-13
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
AbstractThis clearance covers the information that contractors must submit to comply with the following FAR requirements: a. FAR 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment. This clause requires the contractor to submit an adequate final indirect cost rate proposal to the contracting officer and the auditor within the 6-month period following the expiration of each of its fiscal years. The proposed rates shall be based on the contractor’s actual cost experience for that period. Paragraphs (d)(2)(iii) and (iv) of this clause provide a list of the data required to be submitted. The data is customary business financial information that the contractor can access from its automated business systems. b. FAR 52.216-15, Predetermined Indirect Cost Rates. This clause repeats the requirement in the clause at FAR 52.216-7, paragraph (d), for the contractor to submit an adequate final indirect cost rate proposal, however it does not impose any additional reporting requirements. c. FAR 52.242-4, Certification of Final Indirect Costs. This clause requires the contractor’s final indirect cost rate proposal to be certified to establish or modify the rates used to reimburse the contractor for the costs of performing under the contract. The supporting cost data are the cost accounting information normally prepared by organizations under sound management and accounting practices. This clause is incorporated into all solicitations and contracts that provide for establishment of final indirect cost rates, but the Department of Energy may provide an alternate clause for its Management and Operating contracts. d. FAR 52.242-5, Payments to Small Business Subcontractors. This clause requires the prime contractor to self-report to the contracting officer when the prime contractor makes late or reduced payments to small business subcontractors. The notice shall include the reason(s) for making the reduced or untimely payment. e. FAR 52.242-13, Bankruptcy. This clause requires contractors to notify the contracting officer within five days after initiating the proceedings relating to bankruptcy filing. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-1212-005 | Notices Following a Substantial Cessation of Operations | PBGC | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Notices Following a Substantial Cessation of Operations
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes29 USC 1362 (View Law) AbstractSection 4062(e) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) imposes reporting obligations in the event of a “substantial cessation of operations.” This form series is used to fulfill these reporting obligations. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202501-3235-015 | Rule 15c3-3, Customer Protection - Reserves and Custody of Securities | SEC | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Rule 15c3-3, Customer Protection - Reserves and Custody of Securities
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes15 USC 78b (View Law) 15 USC 78c (View Law) 15 USC 78o (View Law) 15 USC 78o-4 (View Law) 15 USC 78q (View Law) 15 USC 78w (View Law) AbstractRule 15c3-3 (17 CFR 240.15c3-3) provides for the protection of customer funds and securities in the custody of a broker-dealer. The Rule sets forth standards for (i) a broker-dealer's acceptance, custody, and use of customer securities, and (ii) the maintenance of reserves with respect to customer deposits and monies obtained from the use of customer securities. Rule 15c3-3 also contains requirements for broker-dealers that hold security futures products for customers. The Commission is revising the collection of information in connection with a recent rulemaking to amend the reserve computation requirements for certain broker-dealers pursuant to its authority under Section 15(c)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202505-1218-004 | The 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane Standard (29 CFR 1910.1044) | DOL/OSHA | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
The 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane Standard (29 CFR 1910.1044)
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesAbstractThe standard requires employers to train workers about the hazards of 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP), to monitor worker exposure, to provide medical surveillance, and maintain accurate records of worker exposure to DBCP. These records will be used by employers, workers, physicians and the Government to ensure that workers are not harmed by exposure to DBCP in the workplace. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-0910-002 | MDUFMA Small Business Qualification Certification | HHS/FDA | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
MDUFMA Small Business Qualification Certification
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes21 USC 379j (View Law) AbstractThe Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 (MDUFMA) requires FDA to collect a user fee from each person who submits certain medical device applications for FDA review. A "small business" is eligible for reduced or waived fees. If an applicant does not provide information to FDA demonstrating to FDA's satisfaction that the applicant is a small business, the applicant must pay the standard (full) fee for any application it submits. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-1212-003 | Filings for Reconsiderations | PBGC | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Filings for Reconsiderations
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes29 USC 1303 (View Law) AbstractPBGC's regulation on Rules for Administrative Review of Agency Decisions prescribes rules governing the issuance of initial determinations by PBGC and the procedures for requesting and obtaining administrative review of initial determinations. For those types of initial determinations subject to reconsiderations, the regulation prescribes rules on who may request reconsideration, when to make such a request, where to submit a request, the required contents of a request, and which PBGC department issues final decisions on a request. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-0960-003 | Application Status | SSA | Active | No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection
Application Status
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesAbstractApplication Status provides users with the capability to check the status of their pending Social Security claims either via the Internet or the National 800 Number Automated Telephone Service. Users need their Social Security number and a confirmation number to access this information. The Application Status shows users when SSA received the application, if we requested additional documents (e.g., military discharge papers, W2s, birth records, etc.), and provides the address for the office that is processing their application. Once SSA makes a decision on a claim, we post a copy of the decision notice online for the user to view. There are some exceptions to posting a copy online, such as disability denial notices (even if filed electronically) or claims that users did not file via the Internet, as we may not have those notices available for online review. Users access this application either via http://www.ssa.gov/onlineservices/ or through the National 800 Number. Respondents are Social Security claimants. We are submitting a Change Request to enhance the current Application Status system to give more information to the public when they request the status of their applications or claims. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202505-4040-002 | SF-424B Assurances -- Non-construction Programs 4040-0007 | EGOV | Active | Reinstatement without change of a previously approved collection
SF-424B Assurances -- Non-construction Programs 4040-0007
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 109 - 282 2590 (View Law) Pub.L. 106 - 107 468 (View Law) AbstractApplicants use the SF-424B to provide information on required assurances when applying for Federal financial assistance under non-construction grant programs. This is a common form. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-0906-001 | Behavioral Health Integration (BHI) Evidence Based Telehealth Network Program (EB-TNP) Measures | HHS/HRSA | Active | New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
Behavioral Health Integration (BHI) Evidence Based Telehealth Network Program (EB-TNP) Measures
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes42 USC 254c-14 (View Law) AbstractThis Information Collection Request is for OMB approval of a new information collection, the Behavioral Health Integration Evidence Based Telehealth Network Program (BHI EB-TNP) Outcome Measures. Under the BHI EB-TNP, HRSA administers cooperative agreements in accordance with section 330I(d)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254c-14(d)(1)). The purpose of this program is to integrate behavioral health services into primary care settings using telehealth technology through telehealth networks and evaluate the effectiveness of such integration. This program supports evidence-based projects that utilize telehealth technologies through telehealth networks in rural and underserved areas to (1) improve access to integrated behavioral health services in primary care settings; and (2) expand and improve the quality of health information available to health care providers by evaluating the effectiveness of integrating telebehavioral health services into primary care settings and establishing an evidence-based model that can assist health care providers. HRSA created a set of outcome measures that focus on behavioral health to evaluate the effectiveness of grantees’ services programs and monitor their progress using performance reporting data. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202507-2577-004CF | SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities. | HUD/PIH | Active | RCF New
SF-LLL Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.
Key Information
|
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-0938-002 | Quality Measures and Administrative Procedures for the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program (CMS-10668) | HHS/CMS | Historical Inactive | Revision of a currently approved collection
Quality Measures and Administrative Procedures for the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program (CMS-10668)
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 111 - 148 3008 (View Law) AbstractThe HAC Reduction Program is established by section 1886(p) of the Social Security Act and requires the Secretary to reduce payments to subsection (d) hospitals in the worst-performing quartile of all subsection (d) hospitals by 1 percent effective beginning on October 1, 2014 and subsequent years. In the FY 2026 IPPS/LTCH PPS proposed rule, we are not proposing to adopt or remove any measures for the FY 2026 program year or subsequent years, we propose updates to the ECE policy. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202506-3220-001 | Employee's Certification | RRB | Active | Reinstatement without change of a previously approved collection
Employee's Certification
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes45 USC 231(f) (View Law) AbstractUnder Section 2 of the Railroad Retirement Act, spouses of retired railroad employees may be entitled to an annuity. The collection obtains information from the employee about the employee's previous marriages, if any, to determine if any impediment exists to the marriage between the employee and his or her spouse. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202412-2577-002 | OpFund Shortfall | HUD/PIH | Active | Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection
OpFund Shortfall
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes44 USC Chapter 35 (View Law) AbstractThis is a new CollectionPublic housing agencies (PHAs) are state-chartered entities, authorized for Federal funding by Section 3 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (“the Act,” 42 USC 1437f). Federal funding for the public housing program is authorized by Section 9 of the Act. A State, or other properly delegated local authority, such as a city, county, or parish, may periodically act to turn the public housing of one PHA over to another PHA or act to combine two or more PHAs into one, multijurisdictional PHA. HUD must be informed in order to (1) perfect its security interest in the public housing, (2) ensure the continued use of the housing as public housing, and (3) guarantee that Federal funding is paid to the proper PHA on behalf of the public housing actually owned by the PHA.. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202503-0579-004 | CEAH NAHMS Poultry 2025 Small Enterprise Study: A National Study of Layers, Broilers, and Turkeys | USDA/APHIS | Active | Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection
CEAH NAHMS Poultry 2025 Small Enterprise Study: A National Study of Layers, Broilers, and Turkeys
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes7 USC 8308 (View Law) 7 USC 391 (View Law) AbstractReinstatement with change of poultry study ICR. The purpose of the collection is to conduct a study to establish baselines for animal health and management practices on U.S. poultry operations, describe management and biosecurity practices of small enterprise operations, and describe producer preparedness for animal health emergencies, including highly pathogenic avian influenza. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202411-1210-002 | Opt-in State Balance Bill Process | DOL/EBSA | Active | Extension without change of a currently approved collection
Opt-in State Balance Bill Process
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 116 - 260 No Surprises Act (View Law) AbstractThe No Surprises Act was enacted as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Pub. L. 116–260). The final rules allow plans to voluntarily opt in to state law that provides for a method for determining the cost-sharing amount or total amount payable under such a plan, where a state has chosen to expand access to such plans, to satisfy their obligations under section 9816(a)–(d) of the Code, section 716(a)–(d) of ERISA, and section 2799A–1(a)–(d) of the PHS Act. A plan that has chosen to opt into a state law must prominently display in its plan materials describing the coverage of outof-network services a statement that the plan has opted into a specified state law, identify the state (or states), and include a general description of the items and services provided by nonparticipating facilities and providers that are covered by the specified state aw. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202501-0584-004 | WIC & FMNP Outreach, Innovation, and Modernization Evaluation | USDA/FNS | Active | New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
WIC & FMNP Outreach, Innovation, and Modernization Evaluation
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing StatutesPub.L. 117 - 2 1106 (View Law) AbstractThe American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 provided FNS with $390 million and waiver authority for WIC modernization. The WIC modernization evaluation will help FNS understand the implementation and impacts of these efforts to inform ongoing and future modernization efforts. Respondents include WIC State and local agencies, WIC/FMNP vendor/market staff, and participants. |
||||||||||||||||
| 202502-2528-001 | Stepped and Tiered Rent Demonstration Evaluation | HUD/PD&R | Active | Revision of a currently approved collection
Stepped and Tiered Rent Demonstration Evaluation
Key Information
Federal Register Notices
Authorizing Statutes12 USC 1701z-1 (View Law) AbstractSection 239 of the Fiscal Year 2016 Appropriations Act, P.L. 114-113 (2016 MTW Expansion Statute), authorizes HUD to expand the Moving to Work (MTW) demonstration program from the current size of 39 Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) to an additional 100 agencies over a period of 7 years. The Statute directs HUD to add new MTW PHAs in cohorts, with each cohort testing a specific policy change so that HUD can conduct a rigorous evaluation of that policy’s effects. A copy of the relevant section of law authorizing the Department to undertake “such programs of research, studies, testing, and demonstration relating to the mission and programs of the Department” (12 USC 1701z-1 et seq.) is included as Appendix H. The second cohort of MTW Expansion PHAs will test alternative ways of setting rents in the public housing and housing choice voucher programs. The traditional rent policy (the Brooke rent) typically sets each household’s rent at 30 percent of their adjusted monthly income. This rent policy is administratively complex and burdensome for PHAs and assisted households. The Brooke rent is hypothesized to be a disincentive for households to increase their earnings, as $100 dollars of increased income would result in $30 of increased rent. In this project—the Stepped and Tiered Rent Demonstration (STRD)—PHAs will implement alternative rents that might be easier to administer and might incentivize assisted households to increase their earnings. Five PHAs will implement a stepped rent, under which a household’s rent will increase modestly each year regardless of their income. Five PHAs will implement a tiered rent, under which households are assigned to income-based tiers and rents are set based on the tier. Both policies will enable households to increase their income without causing an immediate rent increase. Both policies include hardship provisions to prevent high rent burdens. And both policies include less frequent income reexaminations, to reduce the amount of PHA staff time required to administer the program. The STRD will be implemented as a randomized controlled trial (RCT); eligible households (limited to non-elderly, non-disabled households) will be randomly assigned to the new rent policy, or to remain on the traditional rent policy. This design is the gold standard for program evaluation and will enable HUD to conclude whether the new rent policies caused any differences observed between the two groups over time. HUD’s evaluation is expected to last 6 years. HUD has contracted with MDRC to carry out the first phase of HUD’s evaluation, to launch the STRD and lay the foundation for a long-term evaluation. HUD has also allocated resources to support software modifications required by the PHAs to implement the STRD Demonstration. This new information collection has the following components in this collection, all of which are necessary for the evaluation to succeed. |
Why They Are Important
ICRs play a vital role in ensuring transparency and accountability in federal data collection. When federal agencies collect information from 10 or more "persons" (which includes individuals,
businesses, and state, local, and tribal governments), they must submit an ICR to ensure that it fulfills their statutory missions, avoids unnecessary or duplicative requests, and
minimizes burden on the American public. Additionally, Federal Register Notices (FRNs) and the opportunity for public comments provide a formal way for the public to be informed of
proposed ICRs and participate in the process.
ICRs also serve as a key resource for tracking changes to federal data collections. The availability of detailed documentation, such as data collection instruments and methodologies,
allows the general public to identify revisions in a timely manner. These may include revisions prompted by Executive Orders or statistical policies like
OMB's Statistical Policy Directive No. 15 (SPD 15), which are often submitted as "nonsubstantive" or "nonmaterial" changes to a
currently approved collection.[1] Furthermore, ICRs can help determine if a data collection has expired without renewal or has been intentionally
discontinued. By reviewing ICRs, the public can better understand what data is being collected, how it evolves over time, and whether data collections have become inactive–often in response
to shifting priorities and updated standards.
How To Use The Tool
The ICR tracking tool offers a user-friendly view of ICRs that have been recently submitted, reviewed, or are nearing expiration. By aggregating key data from individual ICRs,
the tool allows users to view the current status of each request, including submission, conclusion, and expiration dates, details on whether any changes were made, authorizing statutes,
and more. Users can search for specific information and filter results based on various criteria. If seeking additional information, various text fields are hyperlinked to the full ICR
on RegInfo.gov and associated resources. The tool is updated on a daily basis to reflect the most current information available.
Column descriptions are available below the table.
Column Name
Definition
Categories Include
ICRReferenceNumber
The ICR Reference Number uniquely identifies each ICR review. This number is assigned by the OIRA system when the ICR is created.
ICR Reference Numbers are formatted YYYYMM-NNNN-XXX where YYYYMM is the month of origin, NNNN is the agency/subagency code, and XXX is a 3 digit sequential number assigned per creation per month.
N/A
ICRTitle
The title of the information collection. If the submission is a revision to a currently approved collection, the title is the name of the overall collection rather than the name of the change taking place.
N/A
DateReceived
The date OIRA received the ICR submission from the agency.
N/A
OMBControl
OIRA assigns an OMB Control Number to an Information Collection Request (ICR) upon its first arrival. The same OMB Control Number is used for each review of the ICR.
OMB Control Numbers are formatted NNNN-XXXX, where the NNNN is the agency/subagency code, and the XXXX is a sequential number uniquely identifying the Collection within the agency/subagency’s ICRs.
N/A
DateReceived
The date OIRA received the ICR submission from the agency.
N/A
PreviousICRReferenceNumber
The reference number of the ICR that immediately preceded the current one.
N/A
AgencySubagency
The federal agency and specific subagency, if applicable, that submitted the ICR.
N/A
Abstract
A brief statement describing the need for the collection of information and how it will be used.
N/A
RequestType
Describes the purpose of the agency's submission.
- "Extension without change of a currently approved collection"
- "Existing collection in use without an OMB Control Number"
- "Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection"
- "New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)"
- "No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection"
- "Revision of a currently approved collection"
- "Reinstatement without change of a previously approved collection"
- "RCF Recertification"
- "RCF No Material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection"
- "RCF New"
TypeOfReviewRequest
Indicates the specific type of action being requested for review.
- "Regular"
- "Emergency"
- "Delegated"
Status
Indicates the current stage of the ICR in OIRA's review process.
- "Received in OIRA" for ICRs currently under review by OIRA
- "Active" for ICRs that are currently approved for use by agencies
- "Historical Active" for previous reviews of ICRs that are currently in the active inventory
- "Historical Inactive" for previous reviews of ICRs that are not currently in the active inventory
- "PreApproved" for ICRs that will become active once the Final Rule of their associated rulemaking has been published
ConcludedDate
The date OIRA completed its review of the ICR.
N/A
ConclusionAction
OIRA's final decision about the ICR.
- “Comment filed on Interim Final Rule”
- “Comment filed on Interim Final Rule and continue”
- “Disapproved”
- “Approved without change”
- “Approved with change”
- “Comment filed on proposed rule”
- “Preapproved”
- “Withdrawn”
- “Withdrawn and continue”
- “Not subject to PRA”
- “Not subject to PRA and continue”
- “Improperly submitted”
- “Improperly submitted and continue”
- “Delegated”
- “Comment filed on proposed rule and continue”
- “Disapproved and continue”
- “Returned - Improperly Submitted”
- “Returned to Agency for Reconsideration”
- “Returned - Outside Generic Clearance”
- “Approved”
CurrentExpirationDate
The date the ICR is set to expire unless it is renewed.
N/A
AuthorizingStatues
Names of federal laws that authorize the agency to collect the information.
N/A
AuthorizingStatuesDetails
Additional details about the legal authority for the information collection, including a URL linking to the full text.
N/A
CitationsForNewStatutoryRequirements
Legal citations that have introduced new or modified statutory requirements since the last ICR submission.
N/A
FederalRegisterNotices
Lists citations of 60-day and 30-day notices published in the Federal Register.
N/A
PublicCommentsReceived
Indicates whether any public comments were received during the Federal Register notice period.
N/A
InformationCollections
Lists the individual information collections associated with the ICR. Each collection includes metadata such as the title, a URL to the collection, the form number (if applicable), and a URL to the form.
N/A
RequestType Filters
1. Select "New collection (Request for an OMB Control Number)" for collections that had not previously been used or sponsored by the agency.
2. Select "Extension without change or a currently approved collection" for collections where the agency wished only to extend the approval of an active collection past its current expiration date without making any material change in the collection instrument, instructions, frequency of collection, or the use to which the information is to be put.
3. Select "Revision of a currently approved collection" for collections where the agency request included a material change to the collection instrument, instructions, its frequency of collection, or the use to which the information is to be put.
4. Select "Reinstatement without change of a previously approved collection" for collections which previously had OMB approval, but the approval had expired or was discontinued before this submission was made, and there is no change to the collection.
5. Select "Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection" for collections which previously had OMB approval, but the approval has expired or was discontinued before this submission was made, and there is some change to the collection.
6. Select "Existing collection in use without OMB control number" when the collection is currently in use but does not have an OMB control number.
7. Select "No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection" for collections which introduce minor changes to the ICR, but do not extend the expiration date of the collection.
8. Select "RCF No material or nonsubstantive change to a currently approved collection" for RCF collections that introduce changes to the usage of an active RCF.
9. Select "RCF New" for RCF collections that are the initial usage of the Common Form Host ICR by the using agency.
10. Select "RCF Recertification" for RCF collections that had been recertified due to changes in its related Common Form Host ICR.
[1] "Nonsubstantive" and "nonmaterial" changes introduce minor modifications to the ICR but do not extend the collection's expiration date or require a public comment period.